Letters to the Editor


 

 

Home
Calendar
Letters to the Editor
People & Places
Business News
Bus. Directory
Entertainment
Education
Health Care
Armed Forces
Religion
Police Blotters
Obituaries
Sports

 

Letters to the Editor
Copyright © 2002-2012 Mid-Hudson News Network.
Contents may not be reproduced in any form without written consent.

We welcome your opinion on any subject of interest to Hudson Valley residents.

We do NOT accept 'anonymous' letters or letters submitted by individuals other than the author.

This column may include "Opinion" pieces, submitted by public officials, and "Letters", submitted by citizens.

The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of www.MidHudsonNews.com or anyone associated with this website.

Letters are published in the order they are received, and will remain here for 30 days. Contributors may have one letter published per 30-day period.

Except for possible editing for excessive length, letters are printed as they are received. We do NOT correct spelling, grammatical or syntax errors, or style.

Please read our GUIDELINES

Critical of Skoufis

The dictionary describes an extremist as “a person who holds extreme or fanatical political views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.” This definition matches Assemblyman James Skoufis and his current harmful actions to the detriment of New York women and children.       

Assemblyman Skoufis is the regions leading proponent of the WEP candidate pledge, an effort to block passage of critical legislation. Among the current bills the Assemblyman is blocking is legislation requiring equal pay for women. He is also standing in the way of enacting bills ending workplace related discrimination, including against pregnant women.  Assemblyman Skoufis is even denying passage of increased protections to combat sexual harassment and domestic violence.
                                                                                                 
It is hard to understand why any politician would willingly prevent passage of these critical measures. In Assemblyman Skoufis’ case it is to ensure the passage of extreme abortion legislation that would compromise the health of New York women and children.

This legislation includes allowing non-doctors to perform abortions, allowing late-term and partial birth abortions right up to the moment of birth, and removing criminal penalties for those who illegally perform abortions and hurt women.

In our era of great achievement and modernization it’s unfathomable that Mr. Skoufis is advocating for a reduced standard of care for women, creating serious health and safety consequences.

These tenets of extremism that the Assemblyman is seeking to make law in New York go beyond all sense of human decency. Across most of the modern world the plans Mr. Skoufis endorses are rejected as beyond the norm of acceptability.

As energy is being exerted to pass such extreme measures, working women across New York are earning just 77 cents for every dollar earned by their male counterparts. Little girls, like my daughters and granddaughters, across New York State are rightfully told to work hard and dream big; because there is no barrier they cannot break. Yet my Assemblyman seeks to hinder that reality so he can play extremist politics. 

I cannot help but feel unrivaled disappointment in how my Assemblyman is using his elected position. Mr. Skoufis is not representing the women in my community or in New York State by blocking legislation critical to us solely as a means to achieve dangerous extremes.  

All residents of New York, especially in Mr. Skoufis’ district, deserve better. It is time we demand he stop putting his extremist interests before those of all women and children.

Faye Anson
Goshen
(March 24)

 

State budget and TAP

The finish line for the state budget is voted on April 1st.  In order to meet that deadline, the NY Senate and Assembly will probably advance their own budget plans and then conference to work out their differences while they negotiate with the Governor. Just within these next few weeks!

There is a severe problem with the Governor's budget plan. He will not include money for TAP (Tuition Assistance Program) unless the legislature approves college financial aid for undocumented immigrants and tax credits for students attending private and parochial schools. This means TAP could potentially be eliminated ($1 billion in aid for over 300,000 New York college student recipients)! To eliminate TAP is to make higher education even more unaffordable and unaccessible, which will hurt New York.

It is imperative to act now. Contact your Senator (www.nysenate.gov) and Assemblymember (assembly.state.ny.us/mem/)today and tell them that they must reject the Governor’s budget plan to put TAP at risk. Instead, urge them both to protect TAP awards and approve TAP aid for undocumented immigrants. Let your voice be heard with the issues that matter!

Alexis Polokoff
SUNY New Paltz
(March 24)

 

Raising the smoking age

Your recent report on Westchester County’s attempt to raise the smoking age from 18 to 21 is exciting news in improving the health of young people within the county.  As a Tobacco Cessation Specialist, this is great progress in the mission of preventing tobacco related diseases and deterring young people from beginning an addiction that can follow them through life. 

A new study funded by the American Cancer Society has found that smoking’s toll on health is even worse than previously thought.  The study identifies five additional diseases attributed to smoking including infection, kidney disease, intestinal disease cause by inadequate blood flow, and heart and lung ailments recently linked to tobacco use.

With new tobacco products being marketed to youth every day, raising the age of smoking will be a powerful deterrent in the mission to prevent young people from starting.  Congratulations to the POW’R Against Tobacco team, American Cancer Society’s Mike Burgess and American Lung Association’s Mike Seilback for their hard work, dedication, and continuous efforts for healthy living.

Leilani Lockett
Program Manager-Center for a Tobacco Free Hudson Valley
White Plains
(March 7)

 

A wakeup call

You may have heard of the current battle going on in the Town of Monroe over a 507 acre annexation request by the Village of Kiryas Joel.  This land, currently zoned rural-residential as part of the Town of Monroe, if annexed, will be reasoned to accommodate high density, multi-family units. While Monroe is "ground zero" in this situation, please be aware that this proposed annexation will have a tremendous impact on all those living in the Hudson Valley.

The Village of Kiryas Joel will essentially double in size.    There will be a population explosion with a huge migration to the area.  Currently, as reported in Chris McKenna's Times Herald Record article on June 5, 2014, 93% of Kiryas Joel residents receive Medicaid in addition to other social services.  A doubling of those numbers will place a greatly increased financial burden  on all Orange County residents.

The explosion of traffic and congestion that this large increase in population will bring will affect us all as we traverse the county.

County Executive Neuhaus (who received the Kiryas Joel bloc vote in his election), has already launched a study to build a new sewer line  and treatment facility in New Windsor to accommodate the projected large growth in Kiryas Joel.  The cost for this project, estimated at more than 100 million dollars will become another burden for all us Orange County tax payers.

The environmental effects of clear cutting and building high density housing on these 507 acres will upset the natural ecosystem and displace the current wildlife including Timber rattlesnakes, bald eagles, black bears, deer and hawks

In Monroe, we have formed a grassroots organization, United Monroe (unitedmonroe.org) and a non-profit organization, Preserve Hudson Valley (preservehudsonvalley.org).  Please visit these sites as well as United Monroe's Facebook page  ( https://www.facebook.com/UnitedMonroeNY ) for the latest information.  Also, contact your elected officials (including County Executive Neuhaus and County Legislator Paul Ruszkiewicz) and urge them to vocally oppose this annexation.

This is not a "Monroe issue". This proposed annexation , should it be approved, will greatly change our quality of life in the beautiful Hudson Valley and will surely increase the costs to all Orange County tax payers.  Please pay attention to this issue and spread the word.

Gretchen Pollack
Monroe
(February 26)

 

Thank you for the snow removal

I have been at my place of business at 990 South Lake Boulevard in Mahopac for almost 20 years now.  I have been in contact with Mr. David Keith of the Putnam County Highway Department since 2005 when I sent a letter complimenting the department and telling him what a good job they were doing.

But I have to tell you that this year we had a snowstorm on Tuesday, January 27 and when I arrived at my shop, there wasn’t even a shovelful of snow to be found in front or around my shop. The highway crew again did a great job in making it possible for customers to Park on Route 6N therefore making it possible for us store owners to continue to do business. Mr. Keith and his crew at the Highway Department have an impeccable record for getting the job done!

Jimmy Dee
Mahopac
(February 26)

 

Orange County Government Center

The Orange County legislators have again threatened Paul Rudolph’s Orange County Government Center with demolition.

As a long time friend and business partner of this famous American modernist architect, I am shocked and dismayed that the prospect of this destruction may happen.

The public has been very forthcoming with strong emotional appeals to save this building. But equally important, there is an economic appeal demanding preservation. The Kaufman proposal gives the legislators a new center for $9M less than their demolition plan and also sells the old center for $5M. The old center will be repurposed into an arts center that will bring tourism, business and tax revenue to the site. This can be accomplished in less time than the demolition alternative. Most importantly, a rare architectural monument is preserved for future generations.

I appeal to the legislators to vote in favor of the Kaufman proposal. This solution creates a win-win situation, whereas the demolition of Paul Rudolph’s legacy would be a barbarian act, depriving future generations of experiencing a restored architectural masterpiece.

The legislator has the obligation to the public to minimize the economic impact of its actions while maximizing the aesthetic impact of its actions. They have the opportunity to execute a plan that will save $9 million of taxpayer money (Kaufman proposal vs teardown and new construction) and bring in another $5 million from the sale of the building. This plan will bring the new center on-line a year sooner, resulting in further cost savings. The aesthetic benefits of the Kaufman proposal is that they get a new government center developed by a top architectural firm and a vibrant art center in an architectural masterpiece. Besides saving the masterpiece, they put it on the tax rolls. How can a politician ethically support doing anything other than this scenario?

Ernst Wagner
Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation
246 East 58th Street
New York, NY  
(February 3)

 

Orange County Government Center

The Orange County Government Center’s fate is a hotly debated emotional issue.
But I haven’t seen the very important argument debated about the economic issue.

The Orange County taxpayers have a very strong incentive to seeing the “Kaufman” proposal move forward and the “tear-down and rebuild” proposal be rejected for fiscal reasons.

The Kaufman proposal has the following benefits to the county:

  1. The construction cost will be $9 million less than the tear-down and rebuild option;
  2. The county will receive income of $5 million for sale of the current building to Kaufman;
  3. The construction will be done a year sooner saving on financing costs; and
  4. A historic 150,000 square foot building will be restored and placed on the tax rolls.

The importance of placing the building on the tax rolls is immense:

  1. The building will provide housing and business for the artists expected to locate there;
  2. The building will provide property tax income to Goshen and Orange County;
  3. Sales from the artist businesses located in the building will provide sales tax revenue; and
  4. Tourism and business related to the art center will provide local employment.

The analysis below, based on 2013 figures provided by Orange County, shows that every homeowner in Orange County could have their annual property taxes subsidized by $30 by placing this building on the tax rolls:

Orange County publishes the effective tax rates for the towns as of 2013
www.co.orange.ny.us/filestorage/124/1368/1468/Effective_Tax_Rates.pdf

Goshen had a rate of 2.88% of market value.

If Kaufman buys the OCGC for $5M and improves it and divides it into artist space, he will certainly raise the market value above $5M.
At the 2013 Effective Rate, the below market values add the indicated tax $ to the Goshen coffers:
MARKET VALUE                TAX $
$10M     =             $288,000
$15M     =             $432,000
$20M     =             $576,000

www.orangecountygov.com/filestorage/124/1322/2492/pafr2013.pdf (see page 10)

Orange County received $112M of total property tax in 2013, so this could increase the county’s collections by almost .5%.
If we take the $15M market value and resulting taxes of $432,000, we see that putting the building on the tax rolls could reduce the tax rate for ALL taxpayers by 0.38571%.
Orange County says the average homeowner pays $7850 in real estate tax, so putting the OCGC on the tax rolls @$15M market value would REDUCE the property for every single home in Orange County by over $30!

This could benefit about 90,000 homeowners.

How could anyone fight the logic of this solution? And the solution offers the equally significant achievement of saving an architectural masterpiece for the enjoyment of future generations. I hope the logic of this proposal can be conveyed to the legislature in time for their important vote.

Mark Medoff
246 East 58th Street
New York, NY
(February 3)

 

County Executive proposal for chargebacks for Rockland Community College costs is double taxation

Imagine if you went to the grocery store, paid at the register for your groceries and as you were exiting the store, you were stopped and told that you had to pay for those groceries a second time.   That is exactly what County Executive Ed Day’s proposal to chargeback the Rockland Community College costs to the towns would do.          

In the Rockland County Budget for 2015, real property taxes were levied upon the people of Rockland County in the amount of $107,078,376, for operation of county government in 2015.  Included within that amount was $1.8 million for tuition chargebacks for Rockland County residents who attend community colleges outside of Rockland County and the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT).   The residents of Rockland County have already been taxed to pay for those costs in 2015. See: http://budget.rocklandgov.com/Budget/details/organizationdetails.php?fund=A&org=EDU2490

Now a proposal set forth by County Executive Ed Day will have the County of Rockland charging back each of its five towns for those costs.  No town has budgeted for those chargebacks in 2015.   County Executive Ed Day has threatened to deduct the money from the towns’ share of the sales tax creating a shortfall in their 2015 budgets.  The Town Supervisors are concerned, not only because that will create a deficit in the towns’ 2015 budgets, but will force them to raise taxes to pay for those chargebacks.  The end result will be that Rockland County residents will be charged a second time for community college chargebacks by an increase in town taxes.  In other words, Rockland County residents already paid for those chargebacks in their 2015 County taxes and now will have to pay for it a second time through an increase in their town taxes. 

Community college chargebacks were built into the Rockland County real property tax in 2015.  The County Executive is not proposing to reduce county property taxes by $1.8 million, because if he charges back to the towns, the county taxpayers should no longer have to pay that tax.   Community college chargebacks are contained in the 2015 County Budget.  The County Executive cannot reduce  county property taxes in 2015 by $1.8 million; it is too late, those taxes have been billed.  But instead, simultaneously he has chosen to charge the towns for community college chargebacks in the amount of $1.8 million, so the same residents and taxpayers, which are all residents and taxpayers of Rockland County are effectively paying the chargebacks twice for a total of $3.6 million:  paying taxes once to the County of Rockland and a second time to the towns, for the same expense.   

Ilan S. Schoenberger
County Legislator – District 4 
(February 3)

 

City School Board Member’s – “Police Diversity Plan” Falls Short

In response to Randall Johnson’s call for a City of Poughkeepsie Police Diversity Action Plan ……. ”comprehensive roadmap” to recruit more women and minority police officers in the city” (Mid-Hudson News  1/25/15), Mr. Johnson suggests that the city should hire a Minority Recruitment Police Officer to help recruit at local high schools, churches, and community based organizations.

Mr. Johnson’s plan is very narrow in scope and it falls too short to yield the result that we would need. Recruiting and building a diverse police department goes way beyond talking to the youth at the high school. It encompasses a multi-prong approach that addresses both community & police relations and workforce diversity. Unfortunately, due to his lack of municipal experience, his plan is not cost efficient or an effective way to diversify the city’s Police Department.

To hire a Police Minority Recruitment Officer at $77,971 (including benefits), would be economically unwise. We must strategically deploy our police force and available resources and direct them in a way to protect our community.

As Mayor, I would call on our retired City of Poughkeepsie Police Officers to assist us in recruiting minority applicants. I believe we can train several retired volunteer police officers to talk about law enforcement careers throughout the school year at the local area high school and colleges as well as places of worship.

Secondly, I would request assistance from the County in recruiting efforts throughout the county to find qualified and dedicated minority applicants.   

As a City Councilman I have spoken on the need to diversify our police department as I believe that our police force should be reflective of the neighborhoods they serve and protect.

As a direct result of our outreach efforts with the City of Poughkeepsie Council members, our elected County Legislators and community, the City of Poughkeepsie Police Department had nine minority applicants for November’s civil service exam. The City is currently waiting for the applicants’ test scores. It is my sincere hope that our efforts will have enabled some of these applicants to score high enough to be considered for an interview and future employment with the City of Poughkeepsie. 

As Mayor, my administration would continue to build collaborations and foster strategic partnerships with institutions of higher education (Dutchess Community College, Marist College, SUNY New Paltz), businesses, and military recruiters as our outreach and recruitment efforts must adhere to the new civil service qualifications set by Dutchess County on August 29, 2014:

The initiative I undertook to increase minority applicants in taking the civil service exam is just another example of the experience and leadership skills that I would employ as your next Mayor.   

Robert Mallory
3rd Ward Councilman
Mayoral candidate for the City of Poughkeepsie
(January 28)

 

Guidelines

We encourage submission of diverse opinions, but reserve the right to reject any content that we deem to be potentially libelous or slanderous, or in our opinion, clearly in violation of prevailing community standards of good taste.

Letters must be submitted directly by the author and include the author's hometown (published) and phone number (NOT published).  We do not accept 'on behalf of' letters sent by second parties. 

Letters should:

  • Address a specific issue of local (Hudson Valley) interest
  • Be limited to a single topic
  • Be limited to about 250 words or less (we are very flexible on this). Very long letters may be edited for excessive length.
  • Be written in a normal style i.e. No all UPPER CASE, or NO upper case when appropriate (at beginning of sentences), excessive use of italics, or failure to use standard punctuation including periods (.) at ends of sentences.

We do NOT accept:

  • Anything that in our judgment violates prevailing standards of decency
  • Anything that appears, in our judgment, to advocate, explicitly or implicitly, acts of discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, domestic relationships, or physical or mental limitations
  • Attacks on personal integrity
  • Anything that appears, in our judgment, to be libelous or slanderous
  • “Form” or “seminar” letters (or letters that appears to be)
  • Letters, or content, that appears intended to promote a business, product or service
  • More than one letter per contributor, per 30-day period.

Letters to the editor of midhudsonnews.com are accepted by e-mail only (NO faxes) to: media@statewidenews.com .

We prefer MS Word docs in plain text, but will accept any unformatted text, including e-mail text. Please do NOT send PDFs (Adobe Acrobat).

You must include your name, address and phone number. We will list your name and municipality of residence, only.  Street address* and phone number are for verification and will not be published, unless you request they be published. 
(* Street address may be included if it pertains to a business or organization mentioned promimently in the letter)

Letters will include your name and home town on the signature line.

We will NOT publish "anonymous" letters.

 

 

Tell a friend about this page!
Their Name:
Their Email:
Your Name:
Your Email:

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

 

 

All contents copyright © 2001-2013 Statewide News Network, Inc.
Contents may not be reporduced in any form, including but not limited to,
print, broadcast, Internet or electronic, without expres written permission.
MidHudsonNews.Com is published by Mid-Hudson News Network,
a Division of Statewide News Network, Inc.